Review: The Real Van Gogh, Royal Academy

ART
The Real Van Gogh: The Artist And His Letters
Royal Academy Of Arts
5/5
IN A NUTSHELL
Van Gogh gets to explain himself and his paintings via his prodigious correspondence.
REVIEW
The lighting is low as you enter the main galleries of Burlington House. They will say it is to protect the pigment in the paintings and the raw, sepia ink on the revealing personal letters of Vincent Van Gogh.
But, for me, it is as if low lighting keeps the wild and fidgety colours in their frames; as though, without the restraint of gloom, they would leap from the canvas and spill across floors in an infectious rainbow gush.
For somehow (and this exhibition explores the "somehow" in detail) Van Gogh, through diligence and application, burrowed deep into the unexplored ruffles and folds of the spectrum and emerged with a new colour or a dazzling tone which he would then apply to his canvas with the whirligig exuberance of a successful prospector.
That is one of the themes of the exhibition and the purpose of the letters - to dispel the myth of the ear-slashing lunatic driven solely by passion and torment.
We see the application of a man learning his craft with diligence and humility - indeed some of the sketches are exercises in perspective with the markings still visible.
He writes, mostly to brother Theo, with eloquence and thoughtfulness about his discoveries and how they will apply to his next work (often seen next to the letters).
And on squared paper accompanying his neat, italic hand, he sketches "croquis" - outlines of the piece in preparation which are, in themselves, miniature masterclasses in draughtsmanship.
And, because Theo can't see the colours in these reed pen sketches, Van Gogh tells him, coming alive as he tries to capture the richness and audacity of the palette he has planned.
Of Portrait of A Peasant Girl In Straw Hat (1890) he says: "Big yellow hat with a knot of sky blue ribbons, very red face. Coarse blue blouse with orange spots." Or of L'Arlesienne (1888): "The face grey, the clothing dark, dark, dark just unmixed Prussian blue." Or Cypresses (1899): "The green has such a quality. It's the dark patch in a sun-drenched landscape."
Sometimes his croquis are more prosaic - a sketch of a brush he wants his patron to supply or an easel he is constructing - but all the time he maintains an academic commentary on his prodigious output.
Often his letters attain the status of literature as he roves across his subjects - nature, friendship, religion - creating a self-portrait as compelling as the Self Portrait As An Artist (1888) which watches over this exhibition.
In another he writes: "These canvases will tell you what I can't say in words." It is almost an apology, his message struggling to find an outlet until he finds his stride and then magically there is an explosion of landscapes and portraits and studies. He applies paint like isobars, capturing the storm of energy now his quest has found its true course.
Spontaneity in execution, focus in preparation. This exhibition (sponsored by Wharf bank BNY Mellon) shows both sides of the man and the Royal Academy has worked wonders to bring together 65 paintings, 30 drawings and 35 rarely exhibited letters as evidence.
Curator Ann Dumas has wisely featured letters that contain sketches (as Van Gogh writes in French or Dutch) and has secured some wonderful loans - The Yellow House, Van Gogh's Chair - to tell a tale of a man whose heart may have been darkened with grimy torment but whose soul was bathed in sun-drenched colour.
Mostly this exhibition is an exercise in contrasts. And the contrasts between the perceptions of Van Gogh and his sober reality are as skewed and revealing as his brushstrokes.
- The Real Van Gogh: The Artist And His Letters continues at the Royal Academy Of Arts until April 18. Go to royalacademy.org.uk
Older/Newer
« Clipper MD: River needs more investment | Interview: Singer Florence Rawlings »












Yes,.. I like that saying,... "in a nut shell". Yep,... I was just wondering how it would be possible to get around these doubled edged swords in thought which these letters would actually cause readers. Just turn the lights down so not many will read these letters and most will just compare the paintings to the drawings on the letter heads.
Why bother to translate into English for the majority to read in good lighting, for in the right lighting and good layman's translation,... they wouldn't make much sense to the art world. In leaving them dimly lit and in the original writings of Dutch and French, knowing not many will really bother to try and compare colors and the size canvases mentioned by Vincent would cut down on controversies.
How much longer are these masquerades of his letters going to go on? I know my writing here is going to stump a lot of you, but the MFA experts will know exactly what it is that I'm saying. In fact, this being a censoring world now, this comment will more than likely not be up very long.
Cheers!